Home About Press Employ Contact Spyglass Advanced Search
HHMI Logo
HHMI News
HHMI News
Scientists & Research
Scientists & Research
Janelia Farm
Janelia Farm
Grants & Fellowships
Grants & Fellowships
Resources
Resources
HHMI Bulletin
Current Issue Subscribe
Back Issues About the Bulletin
September '05
Features
divider
Cech
divider
UpFront
divider
Chronicle
divider
Science Education
divider

EXtreme Impactsmall arrow

divider

Undergrad Helps Find Possible West Nile Curesmall arrow

divider

Not Your Ordinary 'Toonssmall arrow

divider

Medical and Dental Students Win HHMI Research Awardssmall arrow

divider

Boosting Science Education, One Step at a Timesmall arrow

divider

Modern-Day Bioethical Issues: The DVDsmall arrow

divider
International Science
divider

A Global Approach to
Global Problemssmall arrow


divider

Uncovering Genetic Combinationssmall arrow

divider
Up Close
divider

Protein Disposal:
Gumming Up the Works


divider
Perspectives
divider
Editor

Subscribe Free
Sign up now and receive the HHMI Bulletin by mail free.small arrow

CHRONICLE: Protein Disposal: Gumming Up the Works

PAGE 2 OF 2

"What was different about what Randy did," says Deshaies, "is that the target was not defined at the outset of the screen. The 'target' was an entire system—a large group of proteins." That left open the possibility that compounds King identified blocked protein degradation at any of a number of steps. It was up to Verma and Deshaies to determine which one.

They analyzed King's compounds further using purified proteasomes and ubiquitin-tagged proteins. Verma and Deshaies systematically narrowed down the possible steps of the protein death march that the inhibitors were blocking. Their first experiments eliminated the two most obvious enzymatic possibilities: removal of the ubiquitin chain and degradation in the core of the proteasome.

The final answer was a surprise. Verma discovered that the inhibitors coated the ubiquitin chain, rendering it unrecognizable to the proteasome's ubiquitin receptors, thereby halting protein destruction before it could even begin.

Degrading Proteins
Degrading Proteins
In this artist's conception, by medical illustrator Graham Johnson, a proteasome degrades a protein.

popup icon View Illustration

Small molecule inhibitors rarely work that way, she notes. Most, like bortezomib, clog the tight spaces at the reactive cores of enzymes. But a small molecule disrupting the broad surface contacts between proteins is like the fairy-tale pea poking the princess through a stack of mattresses.

Deshaies cautions that the compounds (which they named ubistatins) are still unsuitable as drugs. In fact, some of their chemical properties suggest that they may never enter the pharmaceutical pipeline. Instead, he says, "our research offers a proof in principle that the ubiquitin chain-receptor interaction is an Achilles' heel of the ubiquitin-proteasome system that is potentially inhibitable by small molecules." With that established, he says, pharmaceutical researchers might be able to accurately measure the binding of purified ubiquitin chains and ubiquitin chain receptor and then "screen a library of half a million compounds to find one that inhibits that binding."

Such a compound could treat diseases besides cancer, he says. Proteasomes play a key role in regulating inflammation, and proteasome inhibitors might have potential in treating inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, or as anti-tissue rejection drugs for transplant patients. grey bullet

dividers
PAGE 2 OF 2
small arrow Back
dividers
Download Story PDF
Requires Adobe Acrobat
Email This Story

HHMI INVESTIGATOR

Raymond Deshaies
Raymond Deshaies
 
dividers
Back to Topto the top
HHMI Logo

Home | About HHMI | Press Room | Employment | Contact

© 2012 Howard Hughes Medical Institute. A philanthropy serving society through biomedical research and science education.
4000 Jones Bridge Road, Chevy Chase, MD 20815-6789 | (301) 215-8500 | e-mail: webmaster@hhmi.org